Do you think that Jordan's bulls would have won as much rings in the 2000's as he did in 90's?

I honestly think at most Jordan would have won 3 or 4 rings and no three-peat. To me the teams that won the nba finals in the 2000's were better than most of the teams jordan beat in the 90's. For example I dont think Jordan's bulls would have beaten Shaq and Kobe Lakers three straight times. It took them 6 games (and a buzzer beater in each series) to beat Utah Jazz and I just think Lakers were a better team. Also the Spurs were pretty good the 2003, 2005, 2007 team had Manu Ginobili, Tony Parker, Tim Duncan (in my view best power forward of all time, especially defensively) I cant see how Michael would have beaten that team 3 straight times. Also look at Celtics which had Garnett, Pierce, and Allen. Not even Kobe, Gasol, Odom could have beaten that combination and got smoked in game 6 and I think that combination is just as good as Jordan, Pippen, and Rodman.